Announcing the Release of Voices in Captivity: Understanding the Hostages of October 7

 

At We Believe in Israel, we are proud to unveil Voices in Captivity: Understanding the Hostages of October 7, a booklet that seeks to cut through the apathy and confusion surrounding one of the most egregious atrocities of our time. It is not merely an account of events but a call to action—a challenge to confront what remains of our moral courage.

This publication examines the plight of over 100 hostages—men, women, and children—who are still held captive in Gaza. Among them is Kfir Bibas, a child who will turn two on January 18. Instead of a day filled with laughter and love, his birthday will pass in the brutal shadow of captivity. To imagine such innocence enduring such barbarity is to confront the depths of our collective failure.

We felt it imperative to release this booklet now because the world’s attention is slipping. The moral outrage that initially swept across the globe has been dulled by distraction and disinterest. How else can one explain the muted response to the ongoing captivity of children, the elderly, and the innocent? What does it say about us as a civilisation if we cannot muster the strength to stand up for a toddler?

Voices in Captivity is our refusal to accept that silence. It is a response to a society that has grown desensitised to human suffering, and a challenge to those who look away.

The hostages’ captivity is not only a crime—it is an indictment of the global community’s inaction. Each day they remain in Gaza is a day in which the moral fabric of our world is further degraded. These stories are not just accounts of despair; they are an urgent plea for humanity to wake up, to act, and to fight for justice.

As Douglas Murray has so often reminded us, the measure of a society lies in its willingness to defend what is good and true. This is our moment to show we still care. This booklet is a testament to the resilience of those who refuse to yield to terror and a rallying cry for all who believe in the sanctity of life.

The voices of the hostages cry out for justice. Let us ensure they are heard.

 

READ HERE

 

DONATE

Read more

The Blood Libel: A Historical Legacy and Its Modern-Day Manifestations

Introducing Our Report on the Blood Libel: A Historical Legacy and Its Modern-Day Manifestations

At We Believe in Israel (WBII), we have long understood the corrosive and persistent nature of antisemitism in all its forms. While it takes many guises, the blood libel remains one of the most insidious and enduring. It is a myth that has been used for centuries to demonise Jews, stoke hatred, and justify violence against them. Today, in the age of social media and political warfare, this ancient lie has found new life, evolving into a tool to delegitimise the state of Israel and paint its people as monstrous villains. This is the subject of our latest report, The Blood Libel: A Historical Legacy and Its Modern-Day Manifestations.

The blood libel originated in medieval Europe, with horrific accusations that Jews killed Christian children to use their blood in religious rituals. These allegations, wholly unfounded, were weaponised to incite violence, plunder Jewish communities, and justify their expulsion from various European states. The myth became not just a weapon of choice for antisemitic mobs but also for powerful institutions like the Church, which, far from denouncing these lies, perpetuated them. By canonising the “martyr” Simon of Trent, the Church itself endorsed the blood libel, embedding it into the cultural consciousness for centuries.

In our report, we highlight the far-reaching consequences of this toxic narrative, one that has survived to this day. Yet what is perhaps more alarming now is how these accusations have evolved in the 21st century. What was once a claim of Jewish ritual murder has morphed into accusations against the state of Israel—accusations that Israeli soldiers harvest organs, deliberately target children, or engage in other monstrous acts. These modern versions of the blood libel, often propagated through state-run media in parts of the Arab world, echo the same vicious stereotypes and tropes that once fuelled violent pogroms across Europe. Only now, the weapon is not just the mob with torches but the instantaneous reach of social media, where these baseless accusations can spread far and wide, poisoning minds and galvanising violence.

This resurgence is not just a matter of historical interest; it is an urgent issue. The myths that have always justified hatred against Jews and Israel are being peddled once again in public discourse, and the consequences are immediate and deadly. What’s more, they are increasingly being presented as a legitimate form of political critique, which makes them all the more dangerous. We have witnessed how such rhetoric has emboldened violent attacks on Jews and Israelis alike, from the streets of Europe to the Middle East. The blood libel, once confined to the annals of history, is now actively shaping modern geopolitics.

This report seeks to uncover the roots of these myths, expose their continuing spread, and confront them with truth. By tracing the blood libel’s evolution—from its medieval origins to its current form in the realm of antizionism—we aim to arm those who seek to challenge these falsehoods with the knowledge and historical context needed to expose them for what they are: lies designed to destroy lives and delegitimise Israel.

We urge you to read this report in full. Understand the historical significance of the blood libel and recognise its modern-day adaptations. We are not simply fighting a historical battle; we are standing at the front lines of a cultural and political war in which truth and justice are on the line.

At WBII, we remain committed to defending Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign state, free from the baseless hatred that has plagued the Jewish people for centuries. We know that confronting the blood libel with clarity and resolve is the only way forward. We ask you to stand with us, to reject these falsehoods, and to defend the principles of truth, justice, and peace.

 

 

Read The Full Report Here

Read more

Israel’s Medical Field: A Force for Global Good in the Face of Misguided Boycott Calls

Introducing Our New Report: Israel’s Medical Field: A Force for Global Good in the Face of Misguided Boycott Calls

At We Believe in Israel (WBII), we are committed to defending truth and fairness in the discourse surrounding Israel. In recent months, a troubling and divisive narrative has emerged from the UN Special Rapporteur for the Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, who has called for a global medical boycott of Israel. Such a proposal not only distorts the facts but threatens to undermine one of the most vital and universally respected aspects of humanity—healthcare.

Our new report, Israel’s Medical Field: A Force for Global Good in the Face of Misguided Boycott Calls, was born out of a necessity to respond to this rhetoric with clarity, evidence, and compassion.

Why This Report Matters

Israel is a global leader in healthcare, not just within its borders but far beyond. From life-saving innovations like the PillCam and CAR-T immunotherapy to its humanitarian missions in disaster-stricken areas such as Haiti and Turkey, Israel’s medical sector exemplifies the principles of healing and compassion. It is a field that transcends politics, offering solutions that save lives and improve health outcomes across the globe.

A call to boycott this vital sector is not just impractical—it is profoundly unethical. It politicises a domain that should remain a sanctuary of neutrality and collaboration, jeopardising the lives of the very people it claims to support, including Palestinians who receive life-saving treatments in Israeli hospitals.

What the Report Covers

Our report highlights:

  • Israel’s Pioneering Medical Contributions: Showcasing innovations and breakthroughs that have transformed healthcare globally.
  • Humanitarian Outreach and Aid: Demonstrating Israel’s consistent commitment to saving lives in regions affected by conflict, disaster, and poverty.
  • Ethical and Practical Implications: Exposing how a boycott would harm vulnerable populations, disrupt global healthcare, and violate the principles of universal medical ethics.
  • The Bias Behind the Boycott: Contextualising Francesca Albanese’s troubling track record of disproportionate focus on Israel, while neglecting pressing global human rights crises.

Why We Felt Compelled to Act

At WBII, we believe that silence in the face of misinformation and injustice is not an option. A medical boycott is more than an attack on Israel—it is an affront to the principles of medicine, a betrayal of the vulnerable, and a dangerous precedent for politicising healthcare. This report is our contribution to ensuring that truth prevails, that Israel’s life-saving contributions are recognised, and that the international community resists divisive and harmful rhetoric.

We invite you to read the report, share its findings, and join us in championing fairness, collaboration, and the universal values that make medicine a force for good in an increasingly divided world.

 

 Read the Full Report Here

Read more

The Disappearance of Syria's Jews: A Tragedy of Neglect and Erasure

The Forgotten Voice of Syria’s Jews: A Call to Reflection

The story of Syria’s Jews is not merely one of loss but of willful erasure. For over 2,500 years, they were an integral part of Syria’s cultural and economic life, thriving at the crossroads of civilizations. Today, their vibrant communities have vanished, reduced to faint echoes in the ruins of synagogues and the fading memories of the last remaining elders. This report, The Disappearance of Syria’s Jews: A Tragedy of Neglect and Erasure, is not merely an act of remembrance—it is a moral reckoning.

Why did we feel compelled to produce this report? Because it tells a story that must not be forgotten, and because it carries lessons that demand to be learned. The Jews of Syria are but one chapter in the broader history of the Middle East—a region that once exemplified pluralism and coexistence but is now marked by its homogeneity and fragmentation. Their erasure is not just a Jewish tragedy; it is a warning to us all about the dangers of unchecked prejudice, authoritarianism, and global apathy.

A Tragedy of Erasure

For centuries, Jewish communities flourished in cities like Damascus and Aleppo, contributing to trade, intellectual life, and the arts. Yet, in the mid-20th century, a series of deliberate and systematic policies stripped them of their rights, their homes, and their dignity. State-sponsored persecution rendered them prisoners in their own country, while international silence allowed their plight to fester unchallenged.

This report charts their story—from their historical prominence to their tragic disappearance—offering an unflinching look at how a once-vital community was marginalized, scapegoated, and ultimately erased. It also examines the complicity of a world that turned its back, prioritizing geopolitics over human lives.

Why This Report Matters

In a world increasingly indifferent to the plight of minorities, the story of Syria’s Jews serves as a cautionary tale. It is a stark reminder of the fragility of minority communities in times of upheaval and of the devastating consequences of neglect. Their disappearance is not an accident of history but a direct result of deliberate exclusion, societal indifference, and global inaction.

The lessons extend far beyond Syria. From Baghdad to Cairo, the Jewish communities of the Middle East have been decimated, their contributions erased from the historical narrative. This report seeks to challenge that silence. By shining a light on the story of Syria’s Jews, we hope to honor their memory and underscore the urgent need to preserve cultural diversity and protect vulnerable communities wherever they may be.

A Call to Action

History will judge us not by the tragedies we recount but by the actions we take to prevent their recurrence. This report is not just about documenting the past; it is about confronting the present and shaping the future. It is a reminder that silence in the face of oppression is itself a form of complicity.

Let the story of Syria’s Jews awaken us to the value of pluralism, the need for vigilance, and the enduring imperative to stand against injustice. For in preserving their memory, we preserve a shared heritage of resilience, humanity, and hope.

 

Read the full report here

Read more

The Israeli Apartheid Myth: A Tale of Misinformation and Misguided Narratives

 

We Believe in Israel (WBII) is proud to announce the release of our latest report, The Israeli Apartheid Myth: A Tale of Misinformation and Misguided Narratives. In recent years, the accusation of apartheid has been wielded against Israel with increasing regularity, becoming a cornerstone of campaigns that seek to delegitimise the Jewish state. This report represents WBII's commitment to confronting such falsehoods with evidence-based analysis and rigorous scholarship.

Why This Report Was Needed

The term "apartheid" is one of the most charged and historically significant accusations that can be levelled against a nation. Rooted in the systemic racial oppression of South Africa, its misuse against Israel not only distorts reality but also trivialises the suffering of those who lived under genuine apartheid. WBII felt compelled to address this dangerous narrative for several reasons:

  1. Weaponisation of Language: The apartheid accusation is not a neutral critique but a deliberate attempt to delegitimise Israel by exploiting the moral weight of a term associated with profound historical injustice.

  2. Selective Outrage: This narrative often ignores the security challenges Israel faces, including terrorism and existential threats, while applying standards to Israel that are not demanded of other nations.

  3. Echo Chambers and Amplification: NGOs, media, and social media have played a pivotal role in amplifying the apartheid narrative, creating a feedback loop that elevates misinformation over facts.

  4. Context and Truth: Critics routinely strip away the geopolitical, historical, and legal contexts necessary to understand Israel's policies, reducing a complex conflict into simplistic binaries of oppressor and oppressed.

What the Report Offers

This comprehensive report dismantles the apartheid accusation by:

  • Anchoring the analysis in international law and historical precedent.
  • Highlighting Israel's democratic institutions and the full civil rights enjoyed by its Arab citizens.
  • Providing critical context for the governance of the West Bank and Gaza, territories shaped by unresolved conflict and security imperatives rather than racial segregation.
  • Exposing the inconsistencies and biases in the selective outrage directed at Israel while ignoring egregious human rights abuses elsewhere.

The report is not just a rebuttal; it is a call for informed dialogue. It challenges readers to move beyond sensationalist narratives and engage with the nuanced realities of one of the world's most complex geopolitical conflicts.

A Commitment to Truth and Justice

At WBII, we believe that the fight against misinformation is integral to the pursuit of peace. By challenging the apartheid narrative, we aim to foster an environment where facts triumph over propaganda, and constructive solutions can emerge. We invite you to explore the report, share its insights, and join us in advocating for a fair and truthful discourse.

 

READ THE FULL REPORT HERE

Read more

Security Report: Rising Threat of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Its Proxies to the Jewish Diaspora in the United Kingdom

In a world where whispers of hostility can escalate to calls for violence, the importance of vigilance has never been more urgent. Today, WBII presents an eye-opening report on a growing menace: the systematic efforts of the Islamic Republic of Iran, wielded through the notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), to destabilise Jewish communities within the United Kingdom. This detailed examination unmasks a campaign of incitement and division meticulously orchestrated through proxies and ideological allies, who mask their real intentions behind slogans of “resistance” and “liberation.”

Our findings expose a chilling ambition—the IRGC’s drive to disrupt and isolate Jewish communities, emboldening hatred under the guise of political cause. Iran’s operatives are not merely aiming to influence; they are actively mapping Jewish institutions, seeking to weaponise local narratives and cast an entire community as a hostile “other.” This incursion of antisemitic rhetoric into public discourse has moved from the shadows into the mainstream, fuelled by Tehran’s determination to spread discord and rally sympathisers to their cause.

Our report meticulously unpacks these tactics, showing the IRGC’s multi-layered strategy to manipulate public opinion, sow discord, and ultimately create an environment of animosity toward Jewish Britons. It provides essential insights into the ways in which Iran’s malign influence seeks not only to marginalise Jewish voices but to erode the very fabric of British tolerance and unity.

WBII stands committed to illuminating these threats and calling for proactive measures to safeguard our communities. But we cannot do this alone. As we continue to deepen our research and engage with those at the forefront of defending freedom, we ask for your support. Join us as we confront this threat and reaffirm the values that define us—a Britain where tolerance, dignity, and resilience prevail over hatred and division.

Read The Full Report Here

Read more

Zionism: Dispelling Myths and Restoring the Truth of Jewish Identity

 

This report, "Zionism: Dispelling Myths and Restoring the Truth of Jewish Identity," delves into one of the most misunderstood movements in modern history. Zionism, far from being an ideology of exclusion, stands as a testament to resilience, cultural continuity, and justice for the Jewish people in their ancestral homeland.

Through this report, WBII seeks to dismantle common misconceptions, addressing myths that cast Zionism as colonial or exclusionary, when in truth, it is a movement rooted in the universal right of self-determination and the historical bond of Jewish identity with the land of Israel. The report underscores Zionism's long-standing principles, asserting that this is not merely a political construct but an enduring connection spanning millennia, woven into Jewish history, spirituality, and culture.

Join us as we explore Zionism’s core principles of identity, continuity, and the affirmation of a people’s place in the world. This journey challenges the narratives that obscure its true purpose, offering a reclaimed vision of Zionism that celebrates Jewish resilience, contributes positively to global society, and underscores the timeless rights to peace and dignity.

Discover the truth of Zionism and its vital role in the tapestry of Jewish heritage and human dignity.

 

READ THE FULL REPORT HERE

 

 

 

 

 

Read more

The Systematic Oppression of Women by the Islamic Republic of Iran and Its Influence Across the Shia Crescent and Beyond

The Systematic Oppression of Women by the Islamic Republic of Iran and Its Influence Across the Shia Crescent and Beyond


 

Today, We Believe In Israel unveils a critical new report: The Systematic Oppression of Women by the Islamic Republic of Iran and Its Influence Across the Shia Crescent and Beyond. This publication does more than document the appalling state of women’s rights under the Islamic Republic; it explores the broader ramifications of Iran’s gender repression and how its ideology has seeped into the fabric of neighbouring societies—weaponising its influence to transform entire communities.

Since the 1979 revolution, Iran has meticulously crafted a state-led apparatus of control aimed squarely at women, subjecting them to a regime that systematically denies them fundamental freedoms, choices, and protections. But this oppression is not confined to Iran. As our report details, Iran’s model of control has been effectively exported to places like Lebanon, Gaza, and Yemen through proxies such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. These groups, far from merely being allies, are extensions of Tehran's agenda, enforcing regressive policies on women with chilling efficiency.

However, Iran’s ideological reach does not stop within the Shia Crescent. Its influence has seeped into Western discourse as well, repackaged as “cultural resistance” or “anti-imperialist” sentiment. In the UK and other Western nations, certain voices unwittingly amplify Iran’s worldview, normalising gender inequality under the guise of defending cultural authenticity. The Iranian regime has, quite astutely, framed its assault on women’s rights as a matter of “identity,” co-opting the language of cultural and political solidarity to propagate its oppressive doctrines beyond its borders.

This report calls on readers, policymakers, and human rights advocates alike to confront the grave threat posed by the exportation of Iran’s misogynistic policies. To ignore it is to allow an insidious erosion of the principles of equality and justice that underpin our society. We must not be duped by rhetoric that seeks to make repression palatable or culturally specific. The rights of women are universal, and any attempt to undermine them—whether in Iran, across the Shia Crescent, or here in the UK—must be met with unyielding resistance.

We urge all those who cherish the values of freedom, equality, and human dignity to read this report and join us in standing against the tide of oppression emanating from Tehran.

Read the full report HERE

Read more

Report on Palestine Action: A Case for Proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000

 


 

Introduction to WBII’s Report on Palestine Action: A Case for Proscription

In recent years, Britain has witnessed a troubling rise in extremist activism under the guise of political expression. At the forefront of this shift is Palestine Action, a group whose tactics and objectives have evolved well beyond the boundaries of lawful protest. Our new report, "Palestine Action: A Case for Proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000," exposes the true nature of this group: an organisation whose commitment to violence, intimidation, and disruption poses a significant threat to public safety, social cohesion, and the rule of law.

What began as a movement ostensibly protesting UK-Israel defence ties has quickly morphed into a broader campaign of aggression, increasingly targeting Jewish organisations and businesses with links to Israel. Palestine Action’s relentless acts of vandalism, harassment, and direct threats to individuals reveal a radical agenda—one that prioritises coercion over discourse, employing tactics that undermine British values and public safety. Their methods and philosophy align disturbingly well with the legal definition of terrorism, as outlined in the Terrorism Act 2000.

Our report meticulously details the group’s tactics, including deliberate property destruction, reckless endangerment of public safety, and the fostering of a climate that heightens antisemitism. In light of this evidence, we argue that the proscription of Palestine Action is not only warranted but necessary. Proscribing this organisation would empower law enforcement to act decisively, dismantling a network dedicated to sowing division and fear in British society.

We invite you to read this report and understand why the UK must draw a clear line against extremism masquerading as activism. Only by doing so can we protect the rights, safety, and social cohesion that define Britain.

 

Read the full report HERE

Read more

The Digital War on Israel: How Information Warfare is Redefining Anti-Zionism

The Digital War on Israel: How Information Warfare is Redefining Anti-Zionism

The coordinated effort to manipulate Wikipedia's portrayal of the Israel-Palestine conflict illustrates a disturbing shift in anti-Zionism's tactics: the front line has moved decisively to the battlefield of information warfare. No longer content with pushing anti-Israel narratives through traditional activism or biassed reporting, radicals are now targeting the very platforms people turn to for "facts." By altering Wikipedia’s content, they aim to reshape the historical and political landscape to favour Islamist groups while delegitimising Israel. This campaign is not a matter of accidental bias; it is a calculated assault on truth itself.

In the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, we see how deeply entrenched this information war has become. Editors sympathetic to radical causes coordinated to remove mentions of Hamas’s violent 1988 charter, erase records of Iranian regime abuses, and promote fringe academic views as the dominant narrative on issues like Zionism and Israel's legitimacy. The aim is clear: to hijack the historical record, recasting terrorists as freedom fighters and Israel's defensive measures as acts of aggression.

Such manipulation is not only deceitful but profoundly dangerous. Wikipedia’s content appears at the top of Google search results, often shaping public perception before readers even encounter other sources. The impact extends beyond mere words; it influences political debates, policy-making, and even the nature of social discourse. When these platforms are commandeered by ideologues, the line between history and propaganda blurs, leaving ordinary readers adrift in a sea of misinformation.

How the Frontline Shifted to Information Warfare

Anti-Zionist activism has long sought to delegitimise Israel through various means, from divestment campaigns to public demonstrations. However, recent years have seen a strategic pivot towards digital manipulation, reflecting an understanding that controlling the narrative is as powerful as influencing policy. With platforms like Wikipedia being treated as de facto arbiters of truth, radicals have seized upon their vulnerabilities to push extremist agendas under the guise of "information."

The post-9/11 era saw the beginnings of this trend, as Islamist groups sought to recast their image in response to global condemnation. The same tactics have now been adapted to exploit the widespread reach of online platforms. By saturating Wikipedia with biased edits and positioning fringe academic theories as mainstream, these activists are trying to fundamentally alter the way people understand Zionism, Israel’s history, and its right to exist. This shift marks a dangerous escalation, turning an encyclopaedia into a weapon and the very concept of factuality into a battleground.

How We Can and Should Combat This

Combatting this insidious campaign requires a multi-faceted approach. First, Wikipedia itself must take responsibility for the content on its platform. The site should institute stricter controls on politically sensitive topics, limiting edits to verified experts and creating a more transparent process for reviewing contested changes. Failure to do so risks not only losing public trust but allowing the site to be used as a megaphone for extremist propaganda.

Second, there must be a coordinated effort among pro-Israel advocates, historians, and academics to actively participate in editing and monitoring Wikipedia. This requires more than mere reactive edits; it demands a proactive strategy to ensure that balanced, well-sourced content prevails. Training programmes to equip volunteers with the necessary skills and knowledge can play a vital role in this effort, creating a network of contributors who can counter misinformation effectively.

Third, digital literacy must be a priority. Readers should be educated on how to critically evaluate the information they encounter online, including understanding Wikipedia's limitations. Schools, universities, and public forums should incorporate training on recognising bias and detecting manipulated content.

Finally, policymakers should recognise information warfare for what it is—a threat to democratic discourse. Just as governments address disinformation campaigns from foreign states, they must also confront the coordinated online efforts to delegitimise allied nations like Israel. This may involve supporting initiatives that promote digital resilience and developing regulations to hold platforms accountable for content that is weaponised to incite hatred or spread falsehoods.

The stakes in this digital battle are far from trivial. If we fail to defend the integrity of our information sources, we concede the ground not only to those who distort the present but to those who aim to rewrite history itself. The war against Israel is no longer confined to borders; it is waged in the digital realm, where the fight for truth has never been more crucial. It is time for a robust defence—one that ensures the facts cannot be twisted into the weapons of the unscrupulous.

 

The report How Wikipedia’s Pro-Hamas Editors Hijacked the Israel-Palestine Narrative published by Pirate Wires on the manipulation of Wikipedia’s Israel-Palestine coverage reveals something more sinister than mere bias. Following the October 7, 2023, attack, a coordinated effort by around 40 editors sought to reshape narratives, presenting radical Islamist groups in a favourable light and erasing mentions of Hamas’s 1988 charter calling for violence against Jews. This is not simply editing but a concerted attempt to rewrite history.

Even more troubling, groups like "Tech For Palestine" coordinated their efforts using online platforms like Discord to further distort Wikipedia’s content, attempting to influence high-profile articles and even pressure British MPs via manipulated entries. When their activities were exposed, they scrambled to delete traces of their actions.

This exploitation undermines Wikipedia's supposed principles of neutrality. It reveals just how easily online platforms can become tools for ideological warfare. The consequence is not merely misinformation but a wholesale assault on reality itself, as extremists leverage Wikipedia’s reach to normalise fringe views and delegitimise Israel.

If left unaddressed, such tactics will erode Wikipedia’s credibility and compromise the integrity of public knowledge. We must demand greater oversight, stricter enforcement of editorial policies, and accountability for those who hijack digital platforms to pursue ideological agendas. This is not just about protecting an encyclopaedia; it is about safeguarding truth in an age where propaganda is dressed up as fact.



Read more